|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Aims of Study:
Detrusor overactivity can results from dysfunction of any part of the reflex
loops between the bladder afferents and efferents or from an imbalance between
the excitatory and inhibitory control systems of the bladder, integrated by
complex interactions between cortical areas, subcortical areas and the brainstem(The
etiology and pathophysiology of bladder overactivity are very variable and the
classification is rather crude). Bladder overactivity is one that is shown objectively
to contract, spontaneously or on provocation, during the filling phase while
the patients is attempting to inhibit micturition. But there is no classification
system of bladder overactivity according to urodynamic findings. These study
aims analyze the urodynamic findings according to level of neurologic defect
and presence of neurologic lesion.
Methods:
We have retrospectively evaluated clinical charts and cystometric recordings
of 362 patients with overactive detrusor function examined consecutively in
our laboratory during 4 year period 1995 - 1999. They were assigned to 3 group.
The group was based on the level of neurologic lesion. The supraspinal group(n=127)
had neurologic deficit on supraspinal level, the spinal group(n=68) had neurologic
deficit on spinal level and idiopathic group(n=167) had no neurologic deficit.
The parameters studied were maximal cystometric capacity, presence of urge incontinence,
bladder sensation(volume at first desire/maximal cystometric capacity), cystometric
recording of an involuntary detrusor contraction including frequency of detrusor
contraction, volume at occurrence of first unstable contraction, the amplitude
of the maximal unstable contraction and duration of unstable contraction. The
wilcoxon rank sum test was used to test for any significant statistical difference
in these parameters between 2 groups.
Results:
Compared to supraspinal group, spinal group appears to long duration of unstable
bladder contraction(p=0.048). Other parameters were no significant different
in three groups. There was no statistically significant different between neurologic
patients group(supraspinal group + spinal group) and idiopathic group.
|
|
Supraspinal
group |
Spinal
group |
Idiopathic
group |
|
Maximal cystometric capacity (ml) Urge incontinence (%) Bladder sensation |
312.5
± 301.9 92/127
(72.4%) 0.368
± 0.19 |
308.3
± 143.1 47/68
(69.1%) 0.419
± 0.59 |
310.1
± 112.0 88/167
(52.7%) 0.571
± 0.30 |
|
Cystometric
recording frequency of detrusor contraction (times) volume
at occurrence of first unstable contraction (ml) amplitude
of the maximal unstable contraction
(cmH2O) duration
of unstable contraction (seconds)
|
3.44
± 1.19 172.8
± 109.8 59.1
± 32.0 81.6
± 77.1 |
3.51 ± 1.46 163.1
± 101.7 62.8
± 32.5 115.6
± 121.2 |
3.60
± 1.35 190.5
± 168.9 69.4
± 102.1 79.4
± 71.6 |
Conclusions:
We could not found the
different findings in urodynamic study according to neurologic lesion levels
or presence of neurologic abnormality. Regardless of etiology, the urodynamic
finding is similar. So, we suggest it is impossible to identify the cause of
bladder overactivity by urodynamic study.