|

|
Comparison
of Anterior Vaginal wall Sling, Vaginal Wall Sling and Pubovaginal
Fascial Sling in Management of Genunine Stress Urinary Incontinence
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|

|
Authors:
|

|
Seung Ok Yang
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|

|
Institution:
|

|
Choum Am Dong Cju K
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose:
Pubovaginal sling using a strip of rectus fascia to compress the urethra has
been the best known treatment for the stress urinary incontinence. Recently,
sling procedure utilizing the vaginal wall and have come forth and the procedure
appeared to be performed easily more than the pubovaginal sling and the mild
stress urinary incontinence with cystocele have a good outcome by anterior vaginal
wall sling operation(four corner operation). The aim of this study was to compare
the safety and efficacy of the pubovaginal versus the anterior vaginal wall
slings versus vaginal wall slings in treating women with genuine stress incontinence.
Material and Method:
We retrospectively compaired 27 women treated with pubovaginal slings(group
I) for genunine stress unrinary incontinence to 22 women treated with anterior
vaginal wall slings(group II), to 26 women treated with anterior vaginal wall
slings(group III). Parameters of evaluation included the postoperative presence
or urge incontinence, operation time, complications, duration of suprapubic
catheterization, hospuital stay and satisfaction score.
Results:
Baseline clinical and urodynamic data were comparable for both groups. With
a mean follow-up of 32 months(range 19-41) for group I, 24 were cured and 2
were improved. In group II, with a mean follow-up of 21 months(range 5-30),
12 were cured and 8 were improved. In group III, with a mean follow-up of 23
months(range 7-27), 12 were cured and 12 were improved. Postoperative de novo
urge incontinence was present in 4 patient in group I, in 2 patient in group
II and in 1 patient in group III. Postoperative bending pain was present in
3 patient in group I, in 3 patient in group II and in 2 patient in group III.
Group I(88%), group II(83%) and group III(85%) were either vary satified or
somewhat satisfied with their surgical outcome. The operative time, hospital
stays and catheterization of group II and III were significantly lower than
those of group I(p<0.05).
Conclusion:
We concluded that three techniques are equally effective in treating women with
stress incontinence. However, the use of anterior vaginal wall slings and vaginal
wall slings resulted in significantly shorter operative time and hospital stay
compared with pubovagtinal slings. But more long term follow-up recommend for
surgical outcome