|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Aims of Study:
Demographic studies indicate that people are living longer, those over 80 form
the fastest growing section of the population and the prevalence of long term
catheterisation (LTC) rises with age. LTC of the bladder is associated with
a high morbidity; up to 50% of the patients experience catheter blockages. The
management of these patients is usually delegated to a member of the nursing
staff but when the nurse can no longer cope with the recurrent blockages, the
patient is often referred to a urologist for further advice. There is no standard
protocol to follow. How should the patient be managed? Patients with long-term
catheters suffer from a range of co-morbidities; referral to a urological clinic
frequently involves the use of hospital transport, an escort and a stretcher
or chair. A one-stop rapid access catheter clinic was established for these
patients and a report has been prepared from the initial 8 months experience.
Methods:
In April 1999 a letter was sent to all GP's, district nurses and nursing homes
in the Bristol area asking them to identify any individuals with complications
secondary to long-term catheterisation. Patients, accompanied wherever possible
by their carers, were seen at the outpatient clinic. A history, examination
and subsequently a flexible cystoscopy were performed by the medical and nursing
staff. Recommendations were made to the patients' carers, GP and district nurse
in accordance with the findings.
Results:
50 patients with long-term catheter complications were referred to the clinic
within four weeks and a further 40 patients within twelve weeks following distribution
of the letter. Most individuals had not seen a urological specialist previously.
The most common referring complaint was recurrent catheter blockage. To date
77 patients (mean age 73.2 years) have attended. The majority suffered from
a neuropathic bladder disorder and were severely disabled, requiring hospital
transport. 12 patients failed to attend.
| Diagnostic Category | Number |
Recurrent blocker - evidence of encrustation - bladder stone |
27 |
| Recurrent blocker - evidence of encrustation - no stone |
14 |
| Problematic catheter - no evidence of encrustation - debris/mucus |
13 |
Problematic catheter - clear bladder - limited bladder distension |
5 |
| Problematic catheter - no abnormality found | 2 |
| Other | 16 |
66% of patients who had obvious evidence of encrustation on their catheters had some degree of co-existing bladder stone formation. Of these, 14 underwent successful stone extraction at the time of flexible cystoscopy, 11 were referred on for litholapaxy under GA and 2 were managed solely by regular changes of the catheter.
Conclusion:
Long-term urinary catheterisation is associated with a serious morbidity within
the community which is not routinely referred for a urological opinion. Patients
who suffer from recurrent catheter blockages due to encrustation have a 66%
chance of having some degree of co-existing bladder calculus formation. In view
of the similar aetiologies of catheter encrustation and bladder calculus, the
frequency of recurrent blockages due to encrustation is unlikely to decrease
until the stone load has been removed. As LTC rates in the community increase
urologists should help to set standard protocols for nurses to follow so that
patients experiencing difficulties can be referred appropriately.