AN EXPERIMENTAL MODEL REPRODUCING THE RESPONSE OF URINE FLOW RATE TO PENILE CUFF PRESSURE OBSERVED IN MEN

 

Authors:

M J Drinnan,  R S Pickard,  P D Ramsden,  M Reddy,  A Macdonald,  W Robson,  P Hewart,  C J Griffiths
   

Institution:

Departments of Medical Physics & Urology, Freeman Hospital,  Newcastle Upon Tyne,  UK.

     

Conference:

ICS 2000 Tampere

       

Type:

Informally discussed posters

         

Category:

Urodynamics

                 

Aim of study

One in three men will develop lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in later life [1].  These symptoms can be attributed either to bladder outflow obstruction or to a weak bladder contraction.  While conventional cystometry can in principle separate the two groups [2], such measurements are expensive, time consuming, uncomfortable and have some morbidity [3].  Therefore, prostatectomy is often undertaken on the basis of symptoms and flow-rate only.  A quick, non-invasive means for measuring voiding function would be of considerable benefit to such patients [4].

We are investigating the use of an inflatable penile cuff to obstruct flow progressively during emptying of the bladder.  We make continuous recordings of cuff pressure and urine flow rate, which give characteristic pressure-flow graphs for normal and obstructed subjects (fig 1).  The flow typically maintains a fixed value to a knee-point pressure, beyond which it falls steadily to zero.  We believe this characteristic conveys important information about the function of the bladder and outlet.  The aim of this study was to determine the precise relevance of each feature of the pressure-flow characteristic, using a simple experimental model of the bladder-outlet-cuff system.

Methods

The bladder was represented by a fixed head of 120cm water, while the urethra was represented by sections of soft, thin-walled latex tube.  The constriction at the prostatic urethra was modelled by a tube of 3.8mm diameter, while the penile urethra was 9.5mm in diameter.

In vivo, the penile cuff applies a compressive obstruction to the penile urethra [5].  The enlarged prostate may have a similar compressive effect on the prostatic urethra [6].  In our model, the prostatic and penile ‘urethras’ passed through separate airtight boxes.  A pressure (ppros) was applied to the first box to simulate the prostatic opening pressure, while a pressure (pcuff) applied to the second box corresponded to the penile cuff pressure.

Fig 1  Flow rate vs pcuff in male subjects     Fig 2 Flow rate vs pcuff in a hydrodynamic model

Results

Fig 2 shows the relation of flow rate with cuff pressure (pcuff), for a range of prostatic opening pressures (ppros) in the model, and exhibits the following features.  First, and irrespective of the value of ppros, flow stops completely only when the simulated cuff pressure (pcuff) exceeds the simulated bladder pressure of 120cm water.  Second, flow is relatively constant while pcuff is below a knee-point pressure approximately equal to ppros, the pressure applied at the prostatic obstruction.  Third, when pcuff exceeds the knee pressure, a graph of [flow rate]2 versus pcuff gives a straight line whose slope is related to the minimum diameter of the urethral obstruction, here 3.8mm.  These observations are supported by the underlying hydrodynamic theory [6,7].  The similarities between results in the model and in humans are notable.  By analogy with the model, we have therefore raised the following hypotheses for human subjects:

- Only when penile cuff pressure exceeds bladder pressure will urine flow be stopped completely;

- The knee-point pressure at which flow begins to decrease corresponds to the prostatic opening pressure or opening pressure of the flow-controlling zone [6,7];

- Beyond the knee pressure, the flow/pressure relation can be used to estimate the minimum urethral diameter.

Conclusion

We believe our findings may be of significant benefit in understanding and managing patients with outflow disorders, particularly the role of the putative flow-controlling zone.  We now plan to test our hypotheses formally in a large group of both symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.

References

1.             The incidence of benign prostatic obstruction.  J Urol 1968; 99: 639-645.
2.             Outcome of elective prostatectomy.  Br Med J 1989; 299: 762-767.
3.             The effect of prostatectomy on symptom reduction and quality of life.  Br J Urol 1995; 77: 233-247.
4.             Towards a noninvasive urodynamic diagnosis of infravesical obstruction.  Br J Urol 1999; 84: 195-203.
5.             A new method for non-invasive assessment of voiding pressure ?  Assessment of penile cuff occlusion.  Neurourol Urodyn 1999; 18: 256-257.
6.             Urodynamics: the mechanics and hydrodynamics of the lower urinary tract. Medical Physics Handbooks 4. Bristol: Adam Hilger Ltd 1980.
7.             Urethral resistance?  Urodynamic concepts of physiological and pathological bladder outlet function during voiding. Neurourol Urodyn 1985; 4: 161-201.