|

|
TREATMENT OF
POSTOPERATIVE MALE URINARY INCONTINENCE USING TRANSURETHRAL MACROPLASTIQUE
INJECTIONS
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|

|
Authors:
|

|
Taino H, Kylmälä T and
Tammela TLJ
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|

|
Institution:
|

|
Division of Uroloy, Tampere
University Hospital, Finland
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aims of
Study
Various materials, icluding collagen, teflon, and fat, have been used as bulking
agents for intrinsic sphincter deficiency in females, but there is very little
data available on their efficiency in the treatment of iatrogenic stress urinary
incontinence (SUI) in males. Macroplastique is a newer material which consists
of textured silicone particles suspended in a liquid gel (polvinylpyrrolidone).
We aimed to test the effect of Macroplastique injection therapy in the treatment
of postoperative male SUI.
Methods
Twenty-nine consecutive men (mean age 61.5 years, range 52 - 75) suffering from
mild to moderate postoperative SUI were treated with outpatient transurethral
Macroplastique injections. 2.5 - 5 ml of Macroplastique was injected under local
gel anaesthesia to the site of the external sphincter at 5 and 7 o'clock. Twenty-six
of them had undergone radical prostatectomy, 2 TURP and 1 cystoprostatectomy.
Patients suffering from detrusor instability or voiding difficulties were excluded.
Assessment involved a standardised one hour pad test and the patient's own subjective
evaluation of the severity of incontinence. This was graded from 0 to 3 where
0 meant that leaking took place all the time and 3 that patient was completely
dry. Assessments were made prior to injection and again at three months following
each injection. Macroplastique injection therapy was repeated 1-3 times if the
initial treatments were not curative.
Results
Mean pad test loss was 35 ml +10.6 at the baseline. After the first injection
5 patients were completely dry, 11 improved and in the rest no improvement was
achieved. Twenty patients underwent the second injection therapy after which
4 more patients became completely dry and in 2 patients the continence improved
significantly. Eleven patients underwent the third injection therapy after which
5 more patients were completely dry. Only 3 patients did not get any subjective
or objective benefit of the injections and 2 of them did not get any benefit
from the fourth injection. The total volume of injected Macroplastique ranged
from 2.5 to 13.5 ml (mean 7.1 ml). Majority of the patients suffered from some
dysuria following injection therapy but there were no significant side effects.
Conclusions
The prelimary results of endoscopic treatment of mild to moderate postoperative
SUI in males with outpatient Macroplastique injections are encouraging. To achieve
satisfactory result repeated injections are needed. In this way obstructive
complications can be avoided. Longer follow-up and comparative studies are needed
to document the extended duration to other treatment modalities of postoperative
SUI.