|

|
THE CORRELATION
BETWEEN IPSS, PAD TESTING, SEAPI INCONTINENCE QUALITY OF LIFE SCORE,
Q-TIP TEST AND COUGH-INDUCED LEAK POINT PRESSURE (CILPP) IN THE
ASSESSMENT OF FEMALE STRESS INCONTINENCE
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|

|
Authors:
|

|
T. TARCAN, Y. ILKER,
C. KAYA, A. AKDAS
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|

|
Institution:
|

|
Department of Urology,
Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aims of
Study:
Symptom and quality of life scores, pad testing, Q-tip test and urodynamic studies
are commonly used in the clinical assessment of female stress incontinence.
However, the correlation between these diagnostic tests and their clinical significance
remains controversial. The aim of our study was to investigate the correlation
between, SEAPI Incontinence Quality of Life Score [1], pad testing, Q-tip test
and CILPP in women with stress incontinence. Their correlation with International
Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was also studied. Another aim has been to assess
the subgroup women who present with the complaint of stress incontinence but
do not leak during cough-induced stress test in urodynamic studies. The impact
of age, number of child deliveries, presence of urge incontinence and a moderate
to severe cystocele on different parameters was also investigated.
Methods:
A total of 100 consecutive women who have attended our outpatient clinic with
stress incontinence between the years 1999 and 2000 were analyzed in this study.
All patients were assessed by physical examination, urine analysis and culture,
renal and bladder ultrasonography, IPSS, SEAPI Incontinence Quality of Life
score, a 24-hour home pad testing, Q-tip test and urodynamic studies. Urodynamic
studies included a filling cystometrogram with assessment of CILPP as described
in the literature [2]. The correlation between different parameters was studied
by linear regression analysis. Patients who had a CILPP and patients who did
not leak during CILPP measurement were compared by Student-t test in terms of
age, child deliveries, SEAPI Incontinence Quality of Life score, Q-tip test
and pad testing. Likewise, the impact of urge incontinence on SEAPI Incontinence
Quality of Life score was assessed by Student-t test.
Results:
The mean age of the study group was 53.6 with a range of 24 - 79 years. Different
degrees of urge incontinence accompanied stress incontinence in 79 women. However,
no patient was found to have detrusor instability in urodynamic studies. Thirty-one
patients (31%) did not leak by coughing during urodynamic studies whereas the
rest of patients revealed a CILPP. The mean CILPP in 69 patients was 66 cm H20
(range: 20 - 137 cm H2O). No significant correlation was found between age,
number of child deliveries, IPSS, SEAPI Incontinence Quality of Life score,
Q-tip test and number of wet pads/24 hours compared with CILPP (linear regression,
all r2 values <0.1). Likewise, no single parameter mentioned in this
study was found to be significantly correlated with SEAPI Incontinence Quality
of Life score (linear regression, all r2 values <0.1). Similarly,
the presence of urge incontinence or a Grade > 2 cystocele did not significantly
affect the SEAPI Incontinence Quality of Life score, Q-tip test and CILPP results
(Student-t test, all p values > 0.05). No difference was found between patients
who did not leak during CILPP measurement and patients who did in terms of age,
number of child deliveries, Q-tip test, IPSS and Quality of Life scores (Student-t
test, p values >0.05). However, patients who had a CILPP had a significantly
greater number of wet pads compared with patients who did not leak during urodynamics
(a mean of 3.1 versus 1.3 pads/24 hours, respectively, Student-t test, p=0.0006).
Conclusion:
SEAPI Incontinence Quality of Life score, presence of a moderate to severe cystocele,
age, number of child deliveries and Q-tip test are poor predictors of CILPP
in urodynamic studies. Similarly, no significant correlation was found between
SEAPI Incontinence Quality of Life score and other parameters assessed in this
study. Our results have shown that about a third of women with stress incontinence
may not leak during CILPP measurement in urodynamic studies. However, this subgroup
of patients seems to have a lower number of wet pads in pad testing.
References:
1. SEAPI QMM Incontinence classification system. Neurourol Urodyn, 11:187-199,
1992. 2. Validation of cough-induced leak point pressure measurement in the
evaluation of pharmacological treatment of stress incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn,
18:591-602, 1999.