|

|
DECIDING TO
INTERVENE: A STUDY OF NINETEEN NURSES AND THE INTERVENTIONS THEY
USE WHEN CARING FOR PEOPLE WITH URINARY INCONTINENCE
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|

|
Authors:
|

|
Gillian Lloyd
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|

|
Institution:
|

|
Wallsend Community Health
Centre, Wallsend, Australia
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Aim of the Study
This study of nineteen registered nurses from six different nursing practice
settings in one area health service in New South Wales (NSW), Australia arose
from a desire to know more about the nursing care provided for people who are
incontinent of urine. The aim of the study was to identify, describe and explore
by use of grounded theory approach those aspects of nursing practice which typify
the interventions that nurses make when caring for people with bladder control
problems. The researcher set out to identify those factors which illustrate
the spectrum of nurse interventions, for example, from management of the continence
problem by palliative intervention, such as supplying incontinence pads or inserting
indwelling catheters, to management of the problem by helping the person to
become continent. The study was directed towards a better understanding of the
nursing interventions used in the care of incontinent people and of the extent
to which nurses believed that they could make decisions to implement nursing
interventions to manage incontinence and to improve and maintain continence.
The central research question: How are nurses intervening when caring for people
who are incontinent of urine? was derived from the personal observations of
the researcher and the literature on nursing and incontinence.
Method
The study involved the use of a questionnaire designed to elicit demographic
data, the participant's level of exposure to contemporary knowledge in continence
care, and their perception of their knowledge base and abilities, in relation
to assessment and nursing interventions when caring for people who were experiencing
bladder control problems. Twenty-one of the 48 registered nurses, who returned
the questionnaires, agreed to an interview. The semi structured interview was
based on a discussion of incontinence care from the information provided in
two vignettes which described the nature of incontinence experienced by a man
and a woman. Data were collected by questionnaire, memos and interview, and
analysed using the constant comparative method. The grounded theory approach
to data collection and analysis allows researchers to study familiar events,
happenings and patterns of human behaviour, which account for variation in interactions
around a phenomenon. In this type of qualitative research, data collection and
analysis occurs simultaneously, with commonalities and variations in the data
being compared with earlier data collected. By accepting, using and analysing
the data obtained from the participants, an attempt can be made to understand
the participant's perceptions of the problem or phenomenon.
Results
The findings of this study are that nurses expressed a need to be informed and
educated, supported by their peers, managers and all members of the health care
team in order to provide optimum care for incontinent people. Deciding to intervene
in a proactive way is dependent on a number of factors: policies that support
nursing practice; peer consultation and support of other health professionals;
ongoing education; and provision of human and financial resources in order to
support the development of skills appropriate to this more advanced level of
nursing practice. These also include: application of evidence based rationales,
collaborating with clients and other health professionals, development of appropriate
methods of prioritisation, and promoting an educative role involving advocacy
and rehabilitation.
Conclusions
The findings of this study in relation to how nurses intervene in caring for
incontinent people are limited in terms of generalisability. The sample consists
of nurses who returned the questionnaire and volunteered to be interviewed on
the subject. It is also potentially limited in the lack of male nurses as interviewees.
The research was carried out in one area health service in NSW Australia and
it is also recognised that investigating nursing interventions to promote continence
in a variety of settings in Australia, and in other countries, is needed. The
findings, nevertheless, are meaningful, valid and valuable and are advanced
because of the possible implications for nursing practice, education and research.
Rational decision-making highlights the need for nurses to develop good problem
solving strategies and then to be able to move across and utilise a range of
activities appropriate to the client and the situation. Encouraging nurses to
reflect on their own practice might help to eradicate policies that seem to
disempower and deskill nurses. Perhaps the support of management in funding
for continence clinics, appropriate allocation of nursing hours, and provision
of inservice education could, in turn, facilitate the process of decision-making.
These factors were perceived by participants in the study to be a positive contribution
to job satisfaction as well as improving the health outcomes of the client.
Trends to include continence promotion and incontinence management as the work
of specialist nurses only, need to be monitored closely. All nurses must be
encouraged to act as facilitators, to initiate care, as well as act as a care
provider and assist those people, who are incontinent, to improve continence.