|

|
OPTIMIZATION
OF SACRAL ANTERIOR ROOT STIMULATION (SARS) BY THE APPLICATION OF
MULTICHANNEL-GENERATED, QUASITRAPEZOIDAL PULSES IN AN ANODAL BLOCK
TECHNIQUE IN A CANINE MODEL
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|

|
Authors:
|

|
Seif C1, Braun P, Weiß
J, Bross S, Alken P, Juenemann P
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|

|
Institution:
|

|
Dept. of Urology, University
Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIMS OF
STUDY
After spinal cord injury with loss of bladder function, reservoir function and
voiding control can be restored by sacral anterior root stimulation (SARS) with
deafferentation. Previous studies with modified, size-adapted Finetech Brindley
electrodes revealed very good results in selective sphincter blockade and simultaneous
bladder stimulation using modified quasitrapezoidal (QT) pulses in an anodal
block technique. The aim of this study was to apply four QT-pulses, determined
in previous trials, by means of a multichannel bladder stimulator.
METHODS
In acute animal trials, lumbal laminectomy (L4-L7) and sacral deafferentation
(S1-S4) were performed in 6 male anaesthetized foxhounds. The sacral anterior
root S2 was placed into a modified tripolar Brindley electrode. Two mono- and
two biphasic quasitrapezoidal (QT) pulses were applied in uni- and bilateral
trials. Sphincter pressure was urodynamically monitored. Current parameters
that demonstrated the best sphincter pressure reduction in unilateral application
were utilized for multichannel stimulation. Bilateral measurements were analyzed,
evaluated and compared with the multichannel sphincter pressure results. A two-channel
current source (Fraunhofer Institute, IMBT) with two direct arbitrary programmable
signal channels initiated stimulation. Each anterior root was stimulated separately.
RESULTS
A selective urethral sphincter blockade was achieved in all QT series. In bilateral
stimulation trials the average sphincter pressure could be reduced to 8.05 %
of its maximum value. In multichanal stimulation sphincter pressure reduction
to 4.78 % was seen. For maximal sphincter blockade the average current applied
(1.1 to 1.2 mA) was the same with multichannel stimulation and with bilateral
stimulation.
CONCLUSIONS
It is possible to achieve selective urethral sphincter relaxation with the application
of quasitrapezoidal pulses in an anodal block stimulation technique. The application
of individually specified current parameters to each sacral nerves enables better
sphincter blockade than bilateral stimulation using the same parameters for
each side with the application of the same amount of current. Multichannel stimulation
is essential in the development of an neurostimulator that will induce coordinated
and synergic bladder contractions. In the near future it will be possible to
adjust the signal and current in this stimulator for simultaneous parameter
application in accordance with bladder filling.