|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Aims of
Study
Sacral neuromodulation has been shown to be effective in treating patients with
a variety of voiding disorders, including urinary retention (1,2). In order
to determine if permanent sacral neuromodulation may result in normal voiding
in these patients, their response to a percutaneous nerve evaluation test (PNE)
is first determined. How sacral neuromodulation affects voiding function in
these patients is unknown, but its effect may not be immediate. We have analysed
the response of fifteen patients to sacral neuromodulation in order to determine
after what time the maximum benefit is reached, and to try to gain further insights
into its possible method of action.
Methods
The voiding diaries of fifteen patients who underwent a PNE test in our department
were analysed. All had been in complete urinary retention, and all experienced
return towards normal voiding with PNE. The voiding diaries they kept before
and during the PNE were analysed with respect to the volumes of urine passed
spontaneously or with a catheter, and the sensation of bladder filling the patient
experienced prior to voiding or passing a catheter was also noted. The voiding
efficiency (volume of urine passed spontaneously/volume of urine passed by intermittent
self catheterisation plus volume of urine passed spontaneously) of each patient
was calculated for each twelve hour period following PNE insertion.
Results
The recovery of micturition occurred within twelve hours in ten of the patients
(66%), and five patients no longer needed to catheterise by 24 hours. The mean
voiding efficiency of the patients increased, and by 72 hours all but one patient
had a voiding efficiency greater than 85%. The peak of the effect was seen at
96 hours (Graph 1). Fourteen of the fifteen patients reported an increase in
perception of bladder filling during the PNE, while in one there was no reported
change.
Conclusions
The mechanism of action of sacral neuromodulation in patients with urinary retention
remains to be discovered, but studies to elucidate it should concentrate on
changes between baseline and 96 hours. We propose that the onset of the return
of sensation of bladder filling associated with the ability to micturate suggests
that neuromodulation works via a mechanism that involves the afferent innervation.
That the maximal effect is delayed indicates that it is mediated by modulating
effects with a relatively slow time course. The duration of PNE in most centres
is between 3 and 5 days (2,3,4), but our findings suggest that the minimum duration
of PNE should be increased to four days, with a maximum of, perhaps, seven days
for the assessment of the response of patients with retention.
Graph 1: Voiding Efficiency following PNE insertion.

References
1. Neuromodulation of sacral nerves for incontinence and voiding dysfunctions.
Eur Urol 1993;24:72-76
2. Clinical results of sacral neuromodulation for chronic voiding dysfunction
using unilateral sacral foramen electrodes. World J Urol (1998) 16(5): 313-21
3. Predictors of success with neuromodulation in lower urinary tract dysfunction:
results of trial stimulation in 100 patients. J Urol 1994;152:2071-2075
4. Sacral (S3) segmental nerve stimulation as a treatment for urge incontinence
in patients with detrusor instability: results of chronic electrical stimulation
using an implantable neural prosthesis. J Urol 1995; 154: 504-507
This paper was supported by Medtronic Inc.