|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Introduction
& Objectives:
Neuromodulation
represents chronic stimulation of the posterior
root of S3. A sacral reflex mechanism as well
as pontine or cortical centres of modulation
have been postulated. However, so far, the mechanism
and locus of stimulation have not been defined.
Our aim was to evaluate possible alterations
in cortical electrical activity.
Materials & Methods:
We analyzed the cortical electroencephalogram
(EEG, Kölner Vitaport System) for electrodes
placed at Fz, Cz, Cz' and Pz in 6 patients on
3 different days. Subsequently, the posterior
root of S3 was stimulated for a 10-minute period
at 10-second intervals by means of an impulse
generator (Medtronic, Interstim 3023; stimulation
parameters: 1.0 V, 15 Hz, impulse duration 210
ms). This was followed by a stimultion break
lasting 10 seconds. Raw data was analyzed by
Matlab 4.0 software and our own averaging routine.
Results:
All patients demonstrated an EEG potential following stimulation
with a mean latency of 256 ms and a mean amplitude
of 12.6 mV and with a maximum at Cz, corresponding
to the postcentral gyrus.
Conclusion:
In patients with
a neuromodulator and using an "on-off
paradigm", an EEG-potential can be reproduced
with a maximum at the sensory cortical area.
With regard to latency, amplitude and configuration
this can be compared to the so-called "event-related
potentials". Otherwise, it is distinctly
different from pudendal somatosensory evoked
potentials in the diagnostic evaluation of bladder
or sexual dysfunction. Further investigations will clarify whether the site of modulation
is located in the cortex or in pontine areas.